Is This the Return of the AFL-CIA?
(by Lee Sustar | May 17, 2002)
Union leaders routinely state their support for George W. Bush's
"war on terror" and their unconditional backing of the state of
Israel. And following the failed coup in Venezuela last month,
it seems that labor officials may also be returning to the bad old
days when their international efforts were known as the AFL-CIA.
The coup exposed labor's continuing ties to the National Endowment
for Democracy (NED), a nonprofit foundation created by Congress
in 1983. Back then, the NED was notorious for channeling funds for
the US-backed Contra war against the Nicaraguan government —
with the enthusiastic support of then-AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland.
In recent months, the NED used the AFL-CIO to funnel $155,377
to Venezuela's FTV union federation. Leaders of the notoriously
corrupt FTV supported the bosses' strike in the crucial oil industry
that prepared the way for the attempt to topple President Hugo
Chávez. The FTV, which Chávez tried to replace by a referendum,
initially supported the coup —
only abandoning it after its leaders were shut out of the new regime.
FTV leaders had met with the NED and AFL-CIO at a closed-door forum
two months before the coup —
begging the question of whether Chávez's ouster was discussed.
The NED is run by what used to be called "State Department socialists" —
former left-wing intellectuals who joined Ronald Reagan's
anticommunist crusade. Before the mid-1990s, the NED routinely
channeled money through the AFL-CIO's American Institute for
Free Labor Development (AIFLD) to government-run unions in
pro-U.S. dictatorships, from Central America to the Philippines
under Marcos.
After he took over as AFL-CIO president in 1995, John Sweeney
scrapped the AIFLD and replaced it with the American Center for
International Labor Solidarity (ACILS), run by labor progressive
Barbara Shailor. The ACILS carried out work unthinkable in the
Kirkland era —
supporting democratic, independent unions in Mexico, for example.
Nevertheless, the NED still counts the ACILS as one of its "four
core institutes" —
alongside one sponsored by the Republicans, one by Democrats and
one by big business.
Will the AFL-CIO come clean? Stan Gacek, a top AFL-CIO representative
in Latin America, denied that US labor worked with the FTV
to plan the Venezuelan coup. "We ... condemn any and all coups and
unilateral seizures of power which destroy and undermine democratic
institutions, including in Venezuela," he wrote in a statement
distributed over the Internet.
But Kim Scipes —
a longtime labor activist who has written widely on the efforts
of U.S. unions to suppress democratic labor movements in other
countries —
says that Gacek's claims aren't convincing. "For the sake of the
well-being of the U.S. labor movement and labor around the world,
the AFL-CIO must cut all its ties with the National Endowment
for Democracy and ... 'come clean' on their past and present labor operations,"
she wrote on the ZNet Web site.
In fact, in the run-up to last year's AFL-CIO convention, activists
in West Coast labor councils used Scipes' work to pass resolutions
calling on the federation to open its files. The effort to expose
labor's foreign policy secrets can be part of an effort to open a
genuine debate in the labor movement over international issues.
For example, besides supporting Bush's "war on terror," virtually
every top union leader lines up behind Israel, despite its one-sided
war on Palestinians. For his part, Sweeney was a speaker at the
April 15 "Rally for Israel" alongside right-wingers.
Efforts to challenge the pro-war, pro-imperialist positions of labor
leaders have so far been modest, but are still important. Groups
like New York Labor Against War and Labor for Peace and Justice in
San Francisco have given some local union leaders and activists a
platform to oppose Bush's war and his attack on civil liberties.
With the social costs of increased military spending mounting —
and the terrible casualties that would come from Bush's planned
invasion of Iraq —
there will be more opportunities to argue that workers have no
interest in supporting Washington's coups and wars.
|