Should India Back Tibet?
(by R Sengupta | Outlook | December 11, 1996)
As was expected, Tibetan groups staged protests during President
Jiang's visit. But what do they really want? The answer depends on
who you ask.
"If sacrificing Tibet leads to durable, friendly ties between New
Delhi and Beijing, there will be no hindrance from our side,"
asserts Prof Samdhong Rinpoche, the soft-spoken speaker of the
Dharamsala-based Tibetan parliament-in-exile. "The Dalai Lama may
move on, the Tibetans here may be asked to leave or become Indian
citizens...we won't protest." But, he asks, can India ever expect
such a lasting, genuine friendship with China?
The question is taken up by Anand Kumar, sociology professor at
JNU and secretary of the Indo-Tibet friendship society.
"Being the two largest nations in Asia, India and China have a history of
conflict. At best we can be competitors, at worst antagonistic. We
can never be friends." Under intense pressure from the US, European
Union and Australia, which recognise Tibet as a country under
occupation and condemn rights abuse there, the Chinese, he says,
now want reassurance from its largest neighbour over Tibet. Tempa
Tsering secretary, information and international relations, in
the exiled regime welcomes better Sino-Indian ties, but "not at
the expense of another country. That's most unfortunate." He cited
Prime Minister Deve Gowda's "promise" at the Rome food summit that
the Dalai Lama would be barred from indulging in political activity
in India, and wondered whether Gowda had given away too much without
getting anything concrete in return. "Did Beijing make any proposals
vis-a-vis its nuclear arms deal with Pakistan? Did it make any
concessions over its claims on Arunachal and Sikkim?" "Independent
Tibet," observes Tsering, "was an effective buffer state with China,
with a 4,000 km border on the Indian side. Before the Chinese
invasion, this was manned by a few Indian policemen armed with sticks.
Today, India spends Rs 60 crore daily to guard the same border."
The Rinpoche agrees with those who say China wants to
neutralise India by encircling it. He feels cosying up to Pakistan
and Burma where it now has a naval base was part of Beijing's plan
to isolate India strategically. He also points out that
the Dalai Lama's unconditional offer of talks and the "middle path offer"
of an autonomous Tibet (keeping security, foreign affairs under
Beijing) found the Chinese unbending. "Tibet," says he, "has now
become a card which people play according to their interests."
"We handed over Tibet to China on a platter," says TN Chaturvedi,
BJP MP and former CAG. This, he says, is not just the question of
a democratic cause. It affects India's interests directly: the
Chinese have set up missile bases and deployed a 5 lakh-strong
army contingent in Tibet. They are also dumping nuclear waste
there. "Instead of taking advantage of Jiang's own political trouble,
Gowda is hoping to increase his own global stature," he adds.
Rabi Ray, former Lok Sabha speaker and vociferous pro-Tibet lobbyist,
agrees. "Whatever happened," he asks, "to the resolution passed after
the Chinese aggression of '62, which said we won't rest 'till we get
back all the occupied land?" Recently, the Germans reacted strongly
to China's pressure against a meet on Tibet, to be inaugurated
by the Dalai Lama. The Germans went ahead with the meet, and even
passed a resolution in parliament condemning rights abuse in Tibet.
Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, affirming trade ties with China
were crucial, passionately argued that rights abuse was far more
important, says the Rinpoche, who attended the session.
A release by the Tibetan Youth Congress and the Tibetan Women's
Association warned that Jiang's visit was aimed at consolidating
China's regional dominance, "taking advantage" of the coalition
regime in India. It also quotes Nehru as telling Parliament on
December 7, 1950, that "the last voice in regard to Tibet should be
the voice of the people of Tibet and nobody else". As Kumar recalls,
the rest of the world was sleeping then. Now the world backs Tibet,
and India has lapsed into fitful slumber.
|