The Statement of His Holiness the Dalai Lama
(Dharamsala | March 10, 1998)
The Statement of His Holiness the Dalai Lama on the 39th Anniversary
of Tibetan National Uprising Day on 10 March 1998 Dharamsala
Great changes are taking place all over the world at the dawn of a
new millennium. While there are instances of new conflicts breaking
out, it is encouraging that we are also able to witness the emergence
of a spirit of dialogue and reconciliation in many troubled parts
of the world. In some ways, this twentieth century could be called
a century of war and bloodshed. It is my belief that humanity in
general has drawn lessons from the experiences gained during this
century. As a result, I believe the human community has become
more mature. There is, therefore, hope that with determination and
dedication we can make the next century a century of dialogue and
non-violent conflict resolution.
Today, as we commemorate the thirty-ninth anniversary of our freedom
struggle, I wish to express my sincere appreciation and great respect
for the resilience and patience shown by the Tibetan people in the
face of tremendous odds. The current situation in Tibet and the
lack of any substantive progress in resolving the Tibetan problem
is no doubt causing an increasing sense of frustration among many
Tibetans. I am concerned that some might feel compelled to look for
avenues other than peaceful resolutions. While I understand their
predicament, I wish to firmly reiterate once again the importance of
abiding by the non-violent course of our freedom struggle. The path
of non-violence must remain a matter of principle in our long and
difficult quest for freedom. It is my firm belief that this approach
is the most beneficial and practical course in the long run. Our
peaceful struggle until now has gained us the sympathy and admiration
of the international community. Through our non-violent freedom
struggle we are also setting an example and thus contributing to the
promotion of a global political culture of non-violence and dialogue.
The sweeping changes across the globe have also embraced China. The
reforms, initiated by Deng Xiaoping, have altered not only the
Chinese economy, but also the political system, making it less
ideological, less reliant on mass mobilisation, less coercive, and
less stifling for the average citizen. The government is also notably
far less centralised. Moreover, the post Deng Xiaoping leadership
in China seems to have become more flexible in its international
policy. One indication of this is China's greater participation in
international fora and cooperation with international organisations
and agencies. A remarkable development and achievement has been
the smooth transfer of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty last
year and Beijing's subsequent pragmatic and flexible handling of
issues concerning Hong Kong. Also recent statements from Beijing on
restarting cross-strait negotiations with Taiwan reflect apparent
flexibility and softening of its stance. In short, there is no doubt
that China today is a better place to live in than 15 or 20 years
ago. These are historic changes that are commendable. However, China
continues to face grave human rights problems and other formidable
challenges. It is my hope that the new leadership in China, with
this renewed confidence, will have the foresight and courage to
provide greater freedom to the Chinese people. History teaches us
that material progress and comfort alone are not the full answer
to the needs and yearnings of any human society.
In stark contrast to these positive aspects of the development in
China proper, the situation in Tibet has sadly worsened in recent
years. Of late, it has become apparent that Beijing is carrying
out what amounts to a deliberate policy of cultural genocide in
Tibet. The infamous "strike hard" campaign against Tibetan religion
and nationalism has intensified with each passing year. This campaign
of repression - initially confined to monasteries and nunneries -
has now been extended to cover all parts of the Tibetan society. In
some spheres of life in Tibet, we are witnessing the return of an
atmosphere of intimidation, coercion and fear, reminiscent of the
days of the Cultural Revolution.
In Tibet human rights violations continue to be wide-spread. These
abuses of rights have a distinct character, and are aimed at
preventing Tibetans as a people from asserting their own identity
and culture and their wish to preserve it. This Buddhist culture
inspires the Tibetan people with values and concepts of love and
compassion that are of practical benefit and relevance in daily life
and hence the wish to preserve it. Thus, human rights violations
in Tibet are often the result of policies of racial and cultural
discrimination and are only the symptoms and consequence of a deeper
problem. Therefore, despite some economic progress in Tibet, the
human rights situation has not improved. It is only by addressing
the fundamental issue of Tibet that the human rights problems can
be overcome.
It is an obvious fact that the sad state of affairs in Tibet is of
no benefit at all either to Tibet or to China. To continue along the
present path does nothing to alleviate the suffering of the Tibetan
people, nor does it bring stability and unity to China, which are
of overriding importance to the leadership in Beijing. Also, one of
the main concerns of the Chinese leadership has been to improve its
international image and standing. However, its inability to resolve
the Tibetan problem peacefully has been tarnishing the international
image and reputation of China. I believe a solution to the Tibetan
issue would have far-reaching positive implications for China's image
in the world, including in its dealings with Hong Kong and Taiwan
With regard to a mutually-acceptable solution to the issue of
Tibet, my position is very straightforward. I am not seeking
independence. As I have said many times before, what I am seeking is
for the Tibetan people to be given the opportunity to have genuine
self-rule in order to preserve their civilisation and for the unique
Tibetan culture, religion, language and way of life to grow and
thrive. My main concern is to ensure the survival of the Tibetan
people with their own unique Buddhist cultural heritage. For this,
it is essential, as the past decades have shown clearly, that the
Tibetans be able to handle all their domestic affairs and to freely
determine their social, economic and cultural development. I do
not believe that the Chinese leadership would have any fundamental
objections to this. Successive Chinese leaderships have always
assured that the Chinese presence in Tibet is to work for the welfare
of the Tibetans and to "help develop" Tibet. Therefore, given a
political will, there is no reason why the Chinese leadership cannot
start addressing the issue of Tibet by entering into a dialogue
with us. This is the only proper way to ensure stability and unity,
which the Chinese leadership asserts are their primary concern.
I take this opportunity to once again urge the Chinese leadership
to give serious and substantive consideration to my suggestions. It
is my firm belief that dialogue and a willingness to look with
honesty and clarity at the reality of Tibet can lead us to a viable
solution. It is time for all of us to "seek truth from facts"
and to learn lessons derived from a calm and objective study of
the past and to act with courage, vision and wisdom.
The negotiations must aim to establish a relationship between the
Tibetan and Chinese peoples based on friendship and mutual benefit;
to ensure stability and unity; and to empower the Tibetan people to
exercise genuine self-rule with freedom and democracy thus allowing
them to preserve and cultivate their unique culture as well as to
protect the delicate environment of the Tibetan plateau. These are
the principle issues. However, the Chinese government is making
consistent efforts to confuse the real issues at stake. They allege
that our efforts are aimed at the restoration of Tibet's old social
system and the status and privileges of the Dalai Lama. As far as
the institution of the Dalai Lams is concerned, I stated publicly as
early as 1969 that it is for the people of Tibet to decide whether
this institution is to continue or not. In my own case, I made it
clear in a formal policy in 1992 that when we return to Tibet, I
will hold no positions in any future Tibetan government. Moreover, no
Tibetan, whether in exile or within Tibet, has a desire of restoring
Tibet's old social order. It is, therefore, disappointing that
the Chinese government continues to indulge in such baseless and
distorted propaganda. This is not helpful in creating a conducive
atmosphere for dialogue, and I hope that Beijing will refrain from
making such allegations.
I also would like to express my sincere appreciation and gratitude to
the many governments, parliaments, non-governmental organisations,
Tibet support groups and individuals, who continue to be deeply
concerned with the repression in Tibet and urge to resolve the
question of Tibet through peaceful negotiations. The United States
has set a precedence of appointing a Special Coordinator for Tibetan
Affairs in order to facilitate dialogue between us Tibetans and the
Chinese government. The European and Australian parliaments have
recommended similar initiatives. Last December, the International
Commission of Jurists issued its third report on Tibet, entitled
Tibet. Human Rights and the Rule of Law. These are timely initiatives
and most encouraging developments. Moreover, the growing empathy,
support and solidarity from our Chinese brothers and sisters in
China as well as those overseas for the fundamental rights of the
Tibetan people and for my "Middle-Way Approach" are of particular
inspiration and a source of great encouragement for us Tibetans.
Furthermore, on this occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of
India's independence I wish to express on behalf of the Tibetan
people our heart-felt congratulations and reiterate our immense
appreciation and gratitude to the people and government of India,
which has become a second home to the majority of the Tibetans
in exile. India represents not only a safe haven for us Tibetan
refugees, but is also for us a country whose ancient philosophy
of Ahimsa and deep-rooted democratic tradition have inspired and
shaped our values and aspirations. Moreover, I believe India can
and should play a constructive and influential role in resolving
the Tibetan problem peacefully. My "Middle-Way Approach" is in line
with the basic Indian policy vis-a-vis Tibet and China. There is no
reason why India should not be actively engaged in encouraging and
promoting dialogues between Tibetans and the Chinese government. It
is clear that without peace and stability on the Tibetan plateau,
it is unrealistic to believe that genuine trust and confidence can
be restored in the Sino-Indian relationship.
Last year we conducted an opinion poll of the Tibetans in exile and
collected suggestions from Tibet wherever possible on tile proposed
referendum, by which the Tibetan people were to determine the future
course of our freedom struggle to their full satisfaction. Based on
the outcome of this poll and suggestions from Tibet, the Assembly
of Tibetan People's Deputies, our parliament in exile, passed a
resolution empowering me to continue to use my discretion on the
matter without seeking recourse to a referendum I wish to thank the
people of Tibet for the tremendous trust, confidence and hope they
place in me. I continue to believe that my "Middle-Way Approach"
is the most realistic and pragmatic course to resolve the issue
of Tibet peacefully. This approach meets the vital needs of the
Tibetan People while ensuring the unity and stability of the People's
Republic of China. I will, therefore, continue to pursue this course
of approach with full commitment and make earnest efforts to reach
out to the Chinese leadership.
With my homage to the brave men and women of Tibet, who have died for
the cause of our freedom, I pray for an early end to the suffering
of our people and for peace and welfare of all sentient beings.
The Dalai Lama
March 10, 1998
|