Sino-Russian Relation Growing Stronger
(by Ching Cheong | Straits Times | December 4, 2002)
Ties are cemented by need for security and a coordinated approach
towards the US, and desire for economic cooperation
The Chinese and Russian leaders seemed to have moved their bilateral
relations a step forward by reconfirming that they were totally
committed to establishing a 'strategic partnership'. Both leaders,
through signing another joint communique, hailed mutual ties,
saying they have never been closer.
The joint communique, their sixth since 1994 (not including several
bilateral treaties), shows clearly that their perceived common
need to provide a secure strategic rear for both and a coordinated
approach towards the United States, as well as the desire for further
economic cooperation, remain the key factors in cementing bilateral
ties. Security is still the primary concern.
Their common desire 'to be good neighbours, friends and partners and
never be foes' was written into the communique. In line with this,
Russia re-affirmed its support for China's sovereignty claim over
Taiwan and Tibet, while China reciprocated by supporting Russian
suppression of the separatist moves in Chechnya. A coordinated
approach towards the United States is another factor moving them
together.
In their joint communique, they stressed the multi-polarity of the
world and, as such, international relations had to be democratised,
with the United Nations playing a key role in settling international
disputes — a veiled criticism of American unilateralism.
According to a source, this was a significant pointer indicating that
Sino-Russian relations were slightly warmer than Russian-American
relations in the Beijing-Moscow-Washington triangle.
The source said that after the Sept 11 terrorist attacks on the
United States, Moscow had accepted a Washington request to drop the
reference to multi-polarity in any official documents in order not
to irritate a wounded America.
But in the just-signed joint communique with Beijing, the same
phrase and concept stand out prominently. Although he did not offer
any explanation this time, the Russian leader told
the People's Daily, Beijing's official mouthpiece, on May 30 that
he believed in multi-polarity.
He also characterised bilateral relations with China as one of
'non-aligned, non-belligerent, and non-targeting at third parties'.
He believed that relations based on these characteristics
could serve as a new model for state-to-state ties in a multi-polar world.
The joint communique also calls for a joint approach on a
host of international issues, such as the de-nuclearisation of the
Korean Peninsula as well as possible US action against Iraq and
the build-up of missile defence.
Finally, economic incentives provide the lubricant for coming closer.
After the Sept 11 attacks, China seemed to have dropped
the idea of building up a pan-Asian pipeline system to bring oil
from Central Asia to China and through to Japan and Korea.
The obvious reason was none other than the semi-permanent
military presence of the US in the wake of its invasion of
Afghanistan. Following the footsteps of the American soldiers are
the US oil companies.
They succeeded in persuading Caspian Sea oil producers to send oil
out of the land-locked Central Asia westwards, through Nato member
Turkey. This hurt Russian interests for it had been lobbying for
the oil to be sent northwards via existing Russian facilities.
Thus both China and Russia found a common ground for stepping up
cooperation in developing oil-rich Siberia. The joint communique
urged such cooperation to start as soon as possible.
The project under consideration involves a US$1.7- billion
(S$3-billion) investment to build a 2,400-km pipeline linking
Russia's Irkust oil fields to the refineries in Daqing in north-east
China. This would bring 20-30 million tonnes of Russian oil into
China per year, increasing bilateral trade by over US$6 billion
annually. Without concrete economic incentives, relations based
merely on a common political stance could hardly be consolidated.
|